Fadel Chaker's Trial Advances: Potential for Judicial Resolution
February 8, 2026100 VuesTemps de lecture: 2 minutes
Taille de police
16
The trial of Lebanese artist Fadel Chaker has entered a new phase after Judge Bilal Dhanawi postponed the hearing to April 24, where final arguments will be heard regarding charges of incitement to murder, financing terrorism, and illegal possession of weapons.
These developments come amid widespread anticipation regarding the case, which has captured public attention in Lebanon for several years.
These developments come amid widespread anticipation regarding the case, which has captured public attention in Lebanon for several years.
Speculation on Judicial Resolution
Local media reports indicate a rise in speculation about a potential judicial resolution that could conclude the case, particularly following the plaintiff Hilal Hamoud's first testimony in court.
During his testimony, Hamoud accused Chaker of inciting his murder during events in Saida, stating that his role was limited to inciting through loudspeakers inside the Bilal Ben Rabah mosque, without confirming having seen Chaker directly at the scene of the clashes.
Chaker Denies Charges, Claims They Are Fabricated
In court, Fadel Chaker responded to the accusations, challenging what he described as inconsistencies in the plaintiff's statements, asserting that the charges against him are "fabricated."
After the hearing, Chaker spoke to the media, emphasizing that his aim in appearing before the court is to prove his complete innocence, rather than seeking any legal settlement, as he believes the case has political dimensions that extend beyond judicial matters.
Legal Developments May Strengthen Chaker's Position
Previous legal reports have suggested recommendations to drop several charges against the Lebanese artist, including financing terrorism, defamation of a brother country, and money laundering, which could influence the final judgment in the case.
Withdrawal of Personal Action Alters Case Dynamics
Legal experts believe that the withdrawal of personal action by plaintiff Hilal Hamoud represents a significant turning point in the judicial proceedings, noting that the strength of Chaker's defense could enhance his position in the upcoming phase of the trial.
