Fadel Shaker's Trial Advances: Potential for Judicial Resolution
February 8, 202696 ViewsRead Time: 2 minutes
Font Size
16
The trial of Lebanese artist Fadel Shaker has progressed to a new stage following the presiding judge, Bilal Dhanawi's, decision to postpone the session until April 24. This session will focus on the closing arguments related to charges of incitement to murder, financing terrorism, and possession of illegal weapons.
These developments have generated considerable public interest in Lebanon, where the case has been a topic of discussion for years.
These developments have generated considerable public interest in Lebanon, where the case has been a topic of discussion for years.
Speculation on a Possible Judicial Resolution
Local media have reported an increase in speculation about a potential judicial resolution that could conclude the case. This comes after plaintiff Hilal Hamoud appeared in court for the first time. During his testimony, Hamoud accused Shaker of inciting his murder during the events in Sidon, claiming that Shaker's involvement was limited to incitement via loudspeakers at the Bilal bin Rabah Mosque, without confirming seeing him at the scene of the violence.
Shaker Denies the Charges and Calls Them Fabricated
In response to the accusations, Fadel Shaker objected to what he described as inconsistencies in Hamoud's statements, asserting that the charges are "fabricated and constructed." After the session, Shaker spoke to the media, stating that his intention in appearing before the judiciary is to demonstrate his complete innocence, rather than seeking a legal settlement, as he believes the case has political implications beyond the legal realm.
Legal Developments That May Favor Shaker
Previous legal reports have suggested recommendations to dismiss several charges against Shaker, including those related to financing terrorism, insulting a brotherly state, and money laundering, which could influence the final verdict in the case.
Impact of Dropping the Personal Lawsuit
Legal experts argue that Hilal Hamoud's decision to withdraw his personal lawsuit marks a significant turning point in the judicial proceedings, noting that Shaker's self-defense claims may strengthen his position in the upcoming trial phase.
